Frequently Asked Questions - MCH Corporation

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is Application Penetration Testing?

Application Penetration Testing, also known as pen testing, is a simulated cyber attack against your computer system, network, or web application to check for exploitable vulnerabilities. In the context of web application security, it involves testing a running application remotely, without knowing the inner workings of the application, to find potential vulnerabilities.

The purpose of application penetration testing is to identify any weaknesses in a system, network, or application that a hacker might exploit. This is done by mimicking the actions of an attacker using a variety of tools and techniques, with the ultimate goal of finding and securing these vulnerabilities before a malicious actor can take advantage of them.

There are different types of penetration testing including, but not limited to, black box, white box, and gray box penetration testing. The type chosen often depends on the level of knowledge of the system to be tested that the tester is given:

Black Box Penetration Testing: Here, the tester has no prior knowledge of the system. This type of testing simulates an external hacking or cyber attack.
White Box Penetration Testing: In this type, the tester has full knowledge and access to the source code and system architecture. It’s more detailed and thorough as it can also include code analysis.
Gray Box Penetration Testing: Gray box testing is a hybrid approach where the tester has limited knowledge about the system. It’s like a real-world attack but can also include some internal testing.

These tests can reveal vulnerabilities like injection attacks, broken authentications, insecure data handling, or flaws in the system’s logic, among other issues.

Application Penetration Testing should be performed regularly to ensure more consistent IT and network security management by revealing how newly discovered threats or emerging vulnerabilities might potentially impact the security posture of the organization.

Why is Application Penetration Testing necessary?

Application Penetration Testing is necessary for a variety of reasons, mainly revolving around identifying and mitigating potential security threats. Here are some key reasons why it is essential:

Identify Vulnerabilities: Penetration testing identifies security weaknesses in an application that could potentially be exploited by attackers. It is designed to mimic the tactics and techniques of real-world attackers to discover these vulnerabilities.
Prioritize Security Risks: Penetration testing not only identifies security vulnerabilities, but it also helps organizations understand and prioritize these vulnerabilities based on the level of risk they present.
Regulatory Compliance: Certain industry regulations and standards, such as PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) for businesses that handle cardholder information, or HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) in the healthcare sector, require regular penetration testing to be performed.
Customer Trust and Brand Reputation: Security breaches can lead to loss of sensitive customer data, resulting in damage to the company’s reputation and loss of customer trust. Penetration testing helps to prevent such incidents.
Financial Savings: The cost of fixing vulnerabilities after a breach is typically much higher than the cost of regular penetration testing. This is due to potential regulatory fines, loss of customer trust, and the technical cost of fixing the compromised systems while handling the fallout from a breach.
Proactive Improvement: Penetration testing provides insights into where and how the application’s security can be improved. It’s a proactive measure to enhance security posture.
Check Security Controls: Penetration testing checks the effectiveness of the security controls put in place. It helps in validating if the current controls are sufficient and working as intended.
Incident Response: Penetration tests can also be a good way to test an organization’s incident response capabilities, as the test will trigger security mechanisms.

In short, penetration testing is an integral part of any comprehensive information security program. It provides a higher level of assurance that your systems and data are protected from potential threats.

What are the different types of Application Penetration Testing?

There are various types of application penetration testing, which differ based on the amount of knowledge and access provided to the testers. These different types allow organizations to mimic various types of real-world attacks:

Black Box Penetration Testing: This simulates an attack from someone who has no prior knowledge of the system. The tester is given no information beforehand and must find and exploit vulnerabilities just like an external attacker would. It provides a real-world perspective of what an attacker might accomplish.
White Box Penetration Testing: In this type, the tester is given complete knowledge of the system, including network diagrams, source code, IP addressing, etc. This type of testing is designed to find vulnerabilities that may have been missed in the design and development phase or that require in-depth knowledge to identify.
Gray Box Penetration Testing: Gray box testing is a mix of black and white box testing. Here, the tester has some knowledge of the systems (just like an internal person with limited privileges or a contractor) but doesn’t have access to all information. This helps to identify what a potential inside attacker could accomplish.
Targeted Penetration Testing: In this type, both the tester and the IT team work together and keep each other updated about their movements. This type of testing is helpful for understanding the potential impacts and vulnerabilities in real-time.
External Penetration Testing: This tests the assets that a potential attacker on the internet could interact with. This usually includes servers, network devices, and other software systems.
Internal Penetration Testing: Unlike external testing, this focuses on what could happen if the network perimeter was breached or what an authorized user could do.
Blind Penetration Testing: A step further than black box testing, in blind testing, the tester is given only the name of the target company and has to gather all other information themselves. This is a realistic approach as it simulates what a real attacker might do to gather information.

The type of test chosen often depends on what the objectives of the test are and the resources available. All of these testing types can provide valuable feedback on an organization’s security posture.

How often should we perform Application Penetration Testing?

The frequency of application penetration testing can depend on a variety of factors such as regulatory requirements, changes to infrastructure or applications, and the risk tolerance of the organization. However, there are some general guidelines that can be followed:

Annual Testing: As a rule of thumb, conducting penetration testing at least once a year is recommended for most organizations. This helps ensure that any newly discovered vulnerabilities or weaknesses are identified and fixed in a timely manner.
Upon Significant Changes: If there are significant changes to your infrastructure, such as the deployment of a new system or significant updates to an existing application, a new round of penetration testing should be performed to ensure that these changes have not introduced any new vulnerabilities.
Regulatory Requirements: Certain regulations and standards require more frequent testing. For instance, the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) requires a penetration test at least once a year or after any significant changes to the infrastructure.
Industry Specific: Some industries that are frequently targeted by attackers, such as the financial and healthcare sectors, might choose to perform penetration tests more frequently.
Threat Landscape: The rapidly evolving threat landscape might necessitate more frequent penetration testing. As new threats are discovered, regular testing can help ensure that your organization remains protected.
Risk Tolerance: Organizations with a lower risk tolerance may choose to perform penetration testing more frequently.

Remember, penetration testing is just one part of a comprehensive security program. It should be complemented with regular vulnerability scanning, security audits, security awareness training, and the implementation of a robust security policy.

What is the process of an Application Penetration Testing?

Application Penetration Testing follows a systematic process to ensure that all potential vulnerabilities are uncovered and properly addressed. Here’s a general outline of the process:

Planning and Preparation: The first step is to define the scope and goals of the test. This includes identifying the systems to be tested, the testing methods to be used, and the testing tools that will be applied. Also, it’s the time to get necessary permissions and legal agreements in place.
Information Gathering and Reconnaissance: This involves collecting as much information as possible about the application and infrastructure to be tested. This can include any public and private data that could be used in the test.
Threat Modeling: This process identifies potential threats and the areas which could be vulnerable to threats. It helps prioritize testing efforts and use the resources more effectively.
Vulnerability Detection: In this phase, the tester uses various tools and methodologies to identify potential vulnerabilities in the system. This could involve static and dynamic analysis of the application.
Exploitation: The tester attempts to exploit the vulnerabilities identified in the previous step to understand the potential impact of a breach. This could include actions such as escalating privileges, stealing data, intercepting traffic, etc.
Post-Exploitation: After successfully exploiting vulnerabilities, testers attempt to understand the damaged caused by the attack (data loss, access gained, etc.) and figure out whether the vulnerability can be used to exploit further systems.
Analysis and Reporting: This is where the results of the penetration test are compiled into a report detailing the vulnerabilities found, data exposed, and the impact. The report should also include recommendations for addressing each vulnerability.
Cleanup and Remediation: Finally, the organization fixes the vulnerabilities that were identified and tested. The penetration testers may be involved to verify that the fixes are appropriate and effective.
Retesting: Once the vulnerabilities have been addressed, a retest is usually conducted to ensure that the remediation efforts have been successful and that no new vulnerabilities have been introduced during the remediation process.

This process is cyclical and should be repeated regularly to ensure that new vulnerabilities are not introduced as network infrastructures evolve and new threats are discovered.

What should we look for in a Penetration Testing service provider?

Choosing a penetration testing service provider is an important decision, and there are several factors to consider when selecting the right one for your organization:

Relevant Experience: The provider should have a strong track record of performing penetration tests, particularly within your industry. Industry-specific experience can be very valuable, as it means they’re familiar with the unique challenges and threats that businesses like yours face.
Certifications and Qualifications: The team should have industry-recognized certifications such as Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH), Offensive Security Certified Professional (OSCP), and Certified Penetration Tester (CPT), among others. These certifications demonstrate a certain level of skill and knowledge.
Methodology: The provider should follow a thorough and proven methodology to ensure that no part of your network or application is overlooked during the testing process. This includes pre-engagement interactions, intelligence gathering, threat modeling, vulnerability analysis, exploitation, post-exploitation, and reporting.
Scope of Work: Ensure that the provider is able to test all the areas that you need them to, including web applications, networks, mobile applications, wireless networks, and so on.
Reporting: Good reporting is crucial. Reports should not only cover the vulnerabilities found and their severity, but also provide clear, actionable remediation strategies. The provider should also be available to discuss the report and answer any questions you may have.
Reputation: Look for a provider with strong references and testimonials, and one that is known for its integrity and ethical practices. They’ll be handling sensitive information, so it’s crucial to trust them.
Legal and Ethical Considerations: The provider should be able to conduct testing without violating any laws or regulations. They should also hold adequate liability insurance.
Post-Test Support: Some providers offer post-test support, such as helping you implement their recommendations or offering a retest after you’ve made the suggested changes.
Pricing: While cost shouldn’t be the only factor, it’s important to find a provider that fits within your budget. However, keep in mind that the cost of a breach can far outweigh the cost of penetration testing services.

Remember, the goal of a penetration test is to enhance your security posture, so it’s important to find a provider that fits your organization’s specific needs and context.

How disruptive is Application Penetration Testing to daily operations?

Penetration testing can potentially be disruptive to daily operations depending on the scope and methods used during the test. However, professional testers aim to minimize any disruption and should discuss any potential impacts with you before the test begins.

Potential disruptions can occur in the form of system slowdowns, unintentional denial of service, and temporary outages. This can happen as testers may need to probe, exploit, and stress-test various parts of the system. During the exploitation phase, testers might attempt to mimic actions of potential attackers, which could affect system performance or availability.

However, any potential disruptions should be part of the discussion during the planning and preparation phase of the penetration test. You should discuss the scope of the test, potential disruptions, and business-critical systems that may need to be treated more carefully during the test.

Experienced penetration testers will have procedures in place to minimize disruption and ensure that any testing that could cause disruption is carried out during downtime or non-peak hours.

In any case, even if some disruption occurs, it’s important to remember that the purpose of penetration testing is to identify and fix vulnerabilities that could be exploited by real attackers. The temporary disruption caused by a penetration test is minor compared to the potential disruption caused by a real cyber attack.

What kind of vulnerabilities can Application Penetration Testing uncover?

Application Penetration Testing is designed to uncover a broad range of vulnerabilities that could potentially be exploited by attackers. The specifics can vary depending on the application, but some common types of vulnerabilities that can be discovered through penetration testing include:

Injection Flaws: These occur when untrusted data is sent as part of a command or query. The most common example is SQL Injection which can potentially allow an attacker to execute arbitrary SQL code and manipulate the application’s database.
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): XSS vulnerabilities occur when an application includes untrusted data in a new web page without proper validation or escaping, or updates an existing web page with user-supplied data using a browser API that can create HTML or JavaScript.
Security Misconfigurations: This can include unnecessary open ports, unnecessary services running, outdated software with known vulnerabilities, default accounts with their default passwords, and improperly set file and directory permissions.
Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR): An IDOR vulnerability happens when a developer exposes a reference to an internal implementation object. An attacker can manipulate these references to access unauthorized data.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): This type of attack forces a logged-on victim’s browser to send a forged HTTP request, including the victim’s session cookie and any other automatically included authentication information, to a vulnerable web application.
Broken Authentication and Session Management: These can allow attackers to compromise passwords, keys, session tokens, or exploit other implementation flaws to assume users’ identities.
Server Configuration Errors: Misconfigurations can allow unauthorized access to sensitive information, sometimes without requiring any special hacking skill or knowledge.
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards: These can be used to trick users into performing actions they do not intend and may not notice, potentially leading to various types of attacks such as phishing or installation of malware.
XML External Entity (XXE) Attacks: These types of attacks exploit vulnerable XML processors if they’re poorly configured or allow user-supplied XML. This can lead to disclosure of internal files, denial of service, or server side request forgery.
API Security Issues: If the application uses APIs, penetration testing can reveal security issues related to authentication, authorization, data exposure, business logic, etc.

These are just some examples. The specific vulnerabilities that can be uncovered during a penetration test will depend on the specifics of the application and the environment in which it’s being used.

How will the results be reported?

The results of a penetration test are typically provided in a detailed report. The exact format can vary depending on the service provider, but most reports will include the following sections:

Executive Summary: This section is written for high-level executives and non-technical readers. It provides an overview of the testing process, a summary of the findings, the overall risk rating, and a list of high-level recommendations.
Scope and Methodology: This section describes the scope of the test (i.e., what was tested), the methodology used, the time and duration of the test, and any limitations that may have affected the test.
Detailed Findings: This is the heart of the report. For each vulnerability identified, the report should provide a description, the steps taken to exploit it, the potential impact, evidence (such as screenshots), and a risk rating.
Recommendations: For each vulnerability, there should be a specific, actionable recommendation for remediation. This could be a patch, a configuration change, a new control to implement, or sometimes a change in policy or procedure.
Appendices: Depending on the depth of the test and the organization’s needs, the report may include additional information such as raw output from testing tools, a glossary of terms, or additional details on certain vulnerabilities.
Retesting Notes: If retesting was performed to verify that identified vulnerabilities were successfully remediated, the results should be included in the report.

The report should be written in clear, straightforward language that can be understood by both technical and non-technical readers. It should be used as a roadmap for improving the security of the tested systems and applications, and as a tool for communicating about security with various stakeholders within the organization.

What happens if vulnerabilities are found?

If vulnerabilities are found during the application penetration testing, the first step is to understand the nature, severity, and potential impact of each vulnerability. This information will be detailed in the penetration testing report provided by the testing team.

Once the vulnerabilities are understood, the following steps are typically taken:

Prioritization: Not all vulnerabilities are equal. Some may pose a significant risk to your application or network and need to be addressed immediately, while others might be less critical. The vulnerabilities should be ranked based on their severity, ease of exploitation, and potential impact.
Remediation Planning: For each vulnerability, a plan should be developed to address it. This could involve applying a patch, modifying configurations, improving the code, changing operational procedures, or implementing new security controls.
Remediation Implementation: Execute the remediation plan. This could be handled by your internal IT and development teams, or you may need assistance from outside security consultants.
Re-testing: After the vulnerabilities have been addressed, a retest is usually conducted to ensure that the remediation efforts have been successful and that no new vulnerabilities have been introduced in the process.
Documentation: It’s essential to document the discovered vulnerabilities, the steps taken to fix them, and the results of the retest. This documentation can be useful for future reference and for demonstrating due diligence in the event of a security audit.

Remember that finding vulnerabilities is the primary purpose of penetration testing. It’s much better to find and fix these vulnerabilities during a test than to have them discovered and exploited by a malicious attacker.

How does Application Penetration Testing fit into your overall security strategy?

Application Penetration Testing is a crucial component of an overall security strategy. It provides a practical evaluation of your security posture, as it simulates real-world attack scenarios to identify vulnerabilities and weaknesses in your system. Here’s how it fits into the bigger picture:

Risk Identification and Management: Penetration testing helps identify vulnerabilities and threats, which is the first step in risk management. By discovering potential weaknesses and assessing their severity, you can prioritize risks and develop appropriate mitigation strategies.
Validation of Controls: If you’ve implemented security measures and controls, penetration testing can help validate their effectiveness. If a penetration test can bypass these controls, then you’ll know they need to be improved.
Regulatory Compliance: Many regulatory frameworks and standards (e.g., PCI DSS, HIPAA, ISO 27001) require regular penetration testing as part of their compliance requirements. Performing these tests can help demonstrate to auditors and regulators that you’re taking proactive steps to ensure your system’s security.
Staff Awareness and Training: Penetration testing can raise awareness among your staff about the potential vulnerabilities and the importance of adhering to best security practices. It can also serve as a valuable training tool for your IT staff, as they can learn from the testers’ methods and the post-test analysis.
Building Trust: Regularly conducting and learning from penetration tests can help build trust with customers, partners, and stakeholders by demonstrating that you take security seriously and are proactive about finding and fixing vulnerabilities.
Incident Response Preparedness: Penetration tests can provide a kind of “fire drill” for your incident response team. Observing how your team responds to the simulated attacks can provide valuable insights and identify areas where your response procedures can be improved.

While Application Penetration Testing is an essential tool, it should not be the entirety of your security strategy. It should be complemented by other activities, including security awareness training, implementing a secure development lifecycle, keeping software and systems up to date, regular vulnerability scanning, and establishing strong policies and procedures around security.

Is Penetration Testing the same as Vulnerability Assessment?

While both penetration testing and vulnerability assessment are important components of a comprehensive security strategy, they are not the same thing and serve different purposes.

Vulnerability Assessment: This is typically an automated process that involves scanning systems and software to identify known vulnerabilities, such as outdated software, missing patches, or misconfigurations. The goal is to provide a list of vulnerabilities that exist in the system along with the remediation steps. The focus is on breadth rather than depth, aiming to find as many vulnerabilities as possible without exploring their exploitability or potential impact in-depth.
Penetration Testing: On the other hand, penetration testing is a more focused and manual process. It doesn’t just identify vulnerabilities; it also attempts to exploit them to understand their potential impact on the system if they were to be exploited by an attacker. Penetration testing often involves a human tester (or a team of testers) who use the same tactics and techniques as real-world attackers. The goal of penetration testing is to simulate a real-world attack on the system to identify how far an attacker could get and what data they could access or affect.

In simpler terms, vulnerability assessments are about finding as many vulnerabilities as possible, while penetration testing is about seeing how much damage can be done with the vulnerabilities found. Both have their place in an effective security strategy, and many organizations use them in conjunction to get a full picture of their security posture.